Confirmed: No Ferry, No Bridge, No Boat Ramp Moriah Peterson, story and photos: There was a great turnout Thursday evening June 28, 2018 at the public library for the meeting hosted by the National Park Service to discuss a range of options for the Houchin Ferry site. According to documents distributed by the park, the ferry will not be restored, a bridge will not be built, and there will not be a boat ramp. During the meeting, concepts were displayed around the room for viewing and for questions. In the documents, the NPS explained reasons for dismissing the three most popular suggestions from locals:
Concept A is an “existing conditions” concept. This concept is used as a way to evaluate the effects of concepts B, C, and D. It can also help determine why NPS, along with the public may believe changes need to be made. This concept would involve continued use of the south side of the river; the north side would only have the existing vehicular turn-around space. River access would remain unchanged and the overnight and day use facilities would be maintained in their current configurations. Concept B is designed to balance day and overnight use. Concept B’s south side would include twenty-two parking spaces, six campsites, two accessible spaces, six trailer spaces, more picnic shelters in addition to what is there currently, an emergency boat launch, a canoe/kayak launch, and a trail to an overlook. The south side would have a turnaround for vehicles, a trail leading to an overlook with picnic tables, and no improvements to the existing ramp. Concept C is designed to maximize the overnight use of the site. It is documented that concept C will include eighteen parking spaces and one accessible space. Camping will consist of thirteen campsites and six trailer spaces. This concept will also include a trail to pedestrian bridge, canoe/kayak launch, emergency boat launch, and a medium sized picnic shelter. The south side will have a turnaround and parking for vehicles and trailers, a trail leading to pedestrian bridge and picnic tables. There will also be a kayak/canoe launch and three campsites with a porta john. Concept D is planned to maximize day use and would convert all existing campsites into picnic areas and there will be additional small/medium sized shelters. Parking spaces would be increased to thirty-two with two accessible spaces. Six trailer spaces, a trail to an overlook, an emergency boat ramp and a canoe/kayak launch are also part of concept D. The south side will have a vehicle turnaround and parking, a canoe/ kayak launch, along with a trail leading to an overlook with picnic tables and porta john. Mark Kinzer, the project manager, was able to give insight for the Houchin Ferry Timeline. He said in six to eight weeks after public feedback is received, a second document will be released. Fifteen to twenty-- after its release another meeting will be held for more public feedback. Once comments are collected, a decision from the Regional Director of the Southeastern National Park Service will be made and then the funding process will begin. Mr. Kinzer is part of the regional office in Atlanta but is in Kentucky for planning.
Mammoth Cave Superintendent Barclay C. Trimble stated “This is the kickoff stage, we are looking to receive feedback from the community to see what the public wants. Houchin Ferry is a gem in the park, we want to give it the TLC it needs and address the current deficiencies there due to the lowering river levels. We are thrilled to see such a great turnout here tonight.”
5 Comments
Sam Skaggs
6/29/2018 09:03:31 pm
Once again the decision has really been made by the Park Service and our input matters little. Our community made great sacrifice for the Park and this has long been forgotten. A ferry should be restored or really a bridge should have been built years ago. It is a joke to say it is not feasible. Money can be found for a new vistor center, change the roads in the Park. Remember, its not been that long that the islands on 70 were removed at the turn to the vistor center and by Diamond Caverns and then basically changed back. It should be stated time and time again by our elected county officials that we deserve service across the Green River as a matter of public safety, time saved for people, ease of travel to and from the Forks, etc. Long passed that the Park Service really wanted to be a partner to our community and just what is easy for them.
Reply
Chester New
6/30/2018 06:38:20 am
Not growing up here I don’t remember the ferry, so I don’t know the impact it had. But in my opinion, if it has to be one of these concepts, I like the C option. At least a foot bridge would create easier access to both sides and would be more inviting to tourist.
Reply
Howard white
6/30/2018 12:37:29 pm
Sam is right. I love the park, but the officials do not love our county.
Reply
7/1/2018 08:29:05 pm
Why did they even show up?If they have done made their minds up what they will/will not do.Again where does our elected officals stand on this issue.Havent seen the first one take a stand against it
Reply
Michael Thomas
7/2/2018 10:29:03 am
As someone who has lived here all of my 50 plus years, I think I can speak for most all Edmonson Co people when I say no one here cares about a fancy campground, a pedestrian bridge, or all this other complete waste of money. No one here cares about mussel shells either. If the park really cared about what people in Edmonson County want, they'd give us a way to travel across the river there. If anyone thinks these improvements are going to draw tourism dollars here, you are completely dilusional. Draw people to what? The high school? The Family Dollar? Get real people...government BS at its finest.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
May 2024
|