THE EDMONSON VOICE
  • Home
  • News
  • Community
    • VOICE Calendar >
      • About VOICE Calendar
    • County Schools Calendar
  • Obits
  • Sports
    • WildcatsLive/Schedules
    • Recorded Game Videos
  • Weather
  • Features
    • Recipe Of The Week
    • Opinion
    • Ask Mongoose
    • Arts/Entertainment
    • Legal/Professional Policy
    • Our Staff
    • Contest Rules
    • Our Sponsors
  • FAQs
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Edmonson County's Number One Source For Local News and Information

Constable Is Denied Use Of Blue Lights, Threatens County With Lawsuit

2/8/2016

2 Comments

 
PictureDistrict 2 Constable Tim Skees at Fiscal Court (EV file photo)
Darren Doyle, story
A heated exchange between District 2 Constable Tim Skees and Edmonson County Fiscal Court ended with the court denying county constables the right to use blue lights and sirens. Skees followed the decision by storming out of the courtroom, removing his constable uniform and leaving it in the courthouse, later threatening the county with a lawsuit.

Skees, who provides his own car, fuel, and equipment, and also fulfills his duties strictly as a volunteer, has fought repeatedly for the right to use blue lights on his car and for access to the county police frequency. According to Kentucky law, (KRS) each county's fiscal court has the right to either allow or not allow their elected constables use of blue lights and sirens. Constables have never had authority to use blue lights and sirens in Edmonson County.

Const. Skees presented his case before the fiscal court again during the last meeting which was held at night, and Sheriff Shane Doyle spoke in favor of the job that Skees has regularly done for both county and city law enforcement. The issue was agreed to be placed on the agenda for a vote at today's meeting.

Judge Wil Cannon addressed the court today and cited an example of the same vote which recently took place in Breckinridge County, where each district constable's blue light access was voted on separately, not all constables as a whole. "The magistrate I spoke with did not have any problems with any constables. No problems."

He then quoted a section from KRS 189.950, sub-section 5, which states:

Any constable may, upon approval of the fiscal court in the county of jurisdiction, equip vehicles used by said officer as emergency vehicles with one (1) or more flashing, rotating or oscillating blue lights, visible under normal atmospheric condition from a distance of five hundred (500) feet to the front of such vehicle, and a siren, whistle or bell, capable of emitting a sound audible under normal conditions from a distance of not less than five hundred (500) feet. This equipment shall be in addition to any other equipment required by the motor vehicle laws. Any constable authorized by the fiscal court to utilize blue lights and a siren pursuant to this section shall maintain at least the insurance described by KRS 304.39-110.
"The question then becomes, can the fiscal court approve one constable to have them but deny another?" Cannon asked. 

After brief discussion, County Attorney J.B. Hines said that his opinion of the statute allowed the court to vote on one or all constable access, and Cannon agreed. 

"But, if you do that, we've got to have a reason why we're not going to allow one or more of the rest of the constables blue lights," Cannon said. "If we don't have a reason, we're opening up the door for a lawsuit. I don't think we'll get sued, but I know one constable has already threatened to do that."

Cannon also reminded magistrates of the statements made from county and city law enforcement during the last meeting in favor of Constable Skees. "They said Constable Skees was doing a very good job of helping the Sheriff's Department, helping City Police, and just helping people; broke-down motorists on the side of the road. So, we've got one constable out trying to do the right thing, and he does it voluntarily, but if we've got any other constables out there in that same capacity, I'm not aware of it."

Cannon continued: "On the other hand, we've got another constable who's actually been in the way of law enforcement as they were trying to do their duty. So, unlike Breckinridge County, we do have problems here with this issue." Cannon then opened up the floor for a motion and second, allowing a vote for constables to have blue light access. He clarified that the motion would be for any constable, then the court would discuss which ones specifically, would be granted access.

District 2 Magistrate Joe Durbin made the motion, but it was not seconded, which caused the motion to fail.

Mag. Durbin asked Cannon about the issue. "Judge, you said we'd be wrong if we discriminated against one of the constables if they weren't allowed blue lights, but isn't it also wrong to discriminate against Mr. Skees, who has the approval of our law enforcement, when other constables here are not qualified?"

Cannon responded that he felt like it was a liability issue if one constable was allowed, yet another denied.

Durbin replied with, "I'm tired of Tim getting jerked around. We all say, Yeah, he's a good guy, he's ok, he's even assisting, but it's a shame." He then made a comparison. "It would be the same if I, Joe Durbin, wasn't doing a good job as magistrate, but you automatically associated all magistrates being the same...and it's not right."

County Attorney Hines clarified the motion again to state that it was simply to determine if Edmonson County fiscal court would allow blue lights for any one or more constable. He also explained that the court could later set guidelines and criteria as to who could have them, and that "discrimination" was probably not accurate terminology. 

Constable Skees addressed the court. "Let's speak the truth here," he said. "I'm being railroaded here. I'm being held responsible for what Constable Lindsey might do. I've paid my dues, guys. Ask the Brownsville Police Chief..ask the Edmonson County Sheriff."

Skees brought up the lawsuit reference made by Judge Cannon earlier in the discussion. "You talk about 'might get sued?' I have no problem suing someone who discriminates against me, and if you go through with this, that is exactly what you're doing to me. You guys are discriminating against me."

Skees and Cannon went back-and-forth as the conversation became more diligent. "You're doing everything you're doing because you want to, nobody's making you," Cannon said. "And these men have the authority, by law, to either allow it or not, and that's their decision."

Skees replied with, "And their decision is based solely on what Constable Lindsey might do, and we can't let that be the case." 

After another minute or two of the same rhetoric from each side, Attorney Hines spoke up. "Respectfully, we had a motion that came up on simple issue as to whether or not to allow blue lights. The motion was made with no second, thus the issue is dead and it's time to move on."

Constable Skees quickly exited the courtroom as Cannon asked once more if there was a second, which there was not.

Constable Skees submitted a letter to the editor that outlines his plan to hire an attorney and sue the fiscal court for "actions which have made it difficult if not impossible for me to do the job to which I was elected," according to a statement in that letter.
2 Comments
Dist2 Constable Tim Skees
2/10/2016 12:30:39 am


FIRST and foremost, I want to say I support and will CONTINUE to support Sheriff Shane Doyle, for the work he has done, for the training he allowed me to get from his deputies, and for his advice on legal and law matters pertaining to law enforcement duties as well as from past Chief Ricky Sanders and current Police Chief Jeff Jewell. Each have been valued mentors.

I commend Dist2 Magistrate Joe Durbin, for taking a stand, and being man enough to question the judge about the issue at hand.
He alone, as records show, was the only person of the 6 magistrates, who had gall enough to say what the judge was doing to the constable who had the most support ever seen in the history of Edmonson county, was WRONG. Magistrate Durbin did what magistrates are supposed to do. When something is against the greater good or the will of the voters, you call it out and you question it and challenge it if need be.
Magistrate Durbin is also one of those few souls, who are a person of their word. He is NOT a personal friend and I can count on one hand, the amount of conversations we have had in the past year.
The fact is, he challenged and stood up to the wrongs being done that day, and was bulldozed under, just as I and the will of our county's law enforcement and voters were.

I will tell the people, that if I were to do one single thing wrong, or unlawful in any aspect, Shane, or Chief Jewell, would have no quams about arresting me the same as anyone else who had broken the law and required such. I will also say, he is a person of his word as is Chief Jewell, to the letter of the law.

The issue with myself as Constable and fiscal court in no way is a refection on the Sheriff, the Brownsville Police Dept, nor any of the law enforcement officers who serve our county.

By fact that we serve in the same profession, I am proud to call these brave men and women , my family.

The issue with fiscal court is over lights, i.e. "emergency equipment" as defined in the state statutes. The argument is not if I am a peace officer or "cop" as it were.
My authority is set forth in section 106 of the Kentucky Constitution.
State statute expressly forbids any elected official overseeing another, including magistrates and fiscal courts.

Fiscal court has no authority over Constables issues but bonding and the approval of emergency equipment. The authority is statutory and can not be hampered or regulated by fiscal courts.
State laws expressly forbid a Constable being interfered with in the performance of his or her duties.

The Kentucky statutes which gave fiscal courts authority to issue or reject constable lights is in direct conflict with other state statutes which command Constables to " enforce the traffic and criminal codes of the Commonwealth of Kentucky" and further states of Constables, that it "Shall be the duty of them to enforce these."

The problem arises as this. How can you be ordered by state law to enforce traffic laws, yet fiscal court can deny a constable the tools required to do such work (lights).
This is the point of conflict with fiscal court, not the authority or if a Constable "can do anything". Constable authority is the same and has the same jurisdiction as an elected Sheriff, because they are ELECTED by the people. Some magistrate feel, that to hamper or restrict Constables, we will just take their lights away.
This does not diminish law enforcement powers at all. It merely takes away a tool needed to do the job safely, which we were elected to do.

In my situation specifically, I should have been voted on as a free standing office and official, as I am responsible for myself and my office ONLY, and should be judged by my past actions and the recommendations of our certified officers and law enforcement agencies.

When the county judge stated to fiscal court that they would open themselves up for a potential law suit from the Dist4 Constable if they granted lights to me and not him, they threw the baby out with the bathwater.
County Atty Hines, plainly stated to the court and the judge even quoted his research from a nearby county, that each constable may apply individually for his specific office. This is how it is done many places.
Rather than let magistrates vote on me, based on favorable recommendations from every peace officer and agency in Edmonson County, the judge chose to push magistrates into voting on ALL constables as a whole.
In my opinion, this was to simply do away with the issue and deal with myself and the Dist4 constable together at once. Simple, quick, clean, with a 15 person audience only able to question it.
In other words, since Dist4 may sue, we need to penalize Dist2,because of a perceived threat Dist4 poses and has threatened, eliminating the overall constable problem as a whole.
The fact is, the judge set the vote against me by coercing the magistrates to vote on all, and not the individual, as should have been done , merely because of a perceived threat from the distric

Reply
Trish Lindsey Jaggers
2/11/2016 07:51:51 pm

I applaud Mr. Joe Durbin. He is our magistrate here in the Chalybeate/Rhoda area, and I must say that, in the short time he’s been in office, he’s accomplished more than other magistrates did in combined terms.

Discourse and debate are healthy in any community, but we’re sorely lacking in it. He is not afraid to speak out on behalf of his constituents and others, as he proved here. This is commendable.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    COMMENTING/LEGAL
    Deadline INFO
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014

CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO
HOME
NEWS 
COMMUNITY


OBITS
FEATURES
WEATHER
​​
WILDCATS LIVE
​
SPORTS
CONTACT
copyright 2014-2023 The Edmonson Voice.
Call or text: 270-597-6550 ​editor@edmonsonvoice.com
PO BOX 94
BROWNSVILLE, KY 42210
CLICK HERE FOR DEADLINE INFO
  • Home
  • News
  • Community
    • VOICE Calendar >
      • About VOICE Calendar
    • County Schools Calendar
  • Obits
  • Sports
    • WildcatsLive/Schedules
    • Recorded Game Videos
  • Weather
  • Features
    • Recipe Of The Week
    • Opinion
    • Ask Mongoose
    • Arts/Entertainment
    • Legal/Professional Policy
    • Our Staff
    • Contest Rules
    • Our Sponsors
  • FAQs